Find a Qualified Attorney Near You
Find a Qualified Attorney Near You
Search by legal issue and/or location
Enter information in one or both fields. (Required)
Defenses to Libel and Slander
This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy, clarity, and style by FindLaw’s team of legal writers and attorneys and in accordance with our editorial standards.
The last updated date refers to the last time this article was reviewed by FindLaw or one of our contributing authors. We make every effort to keep our articles updated. For information regarding a specific legal issue affecting you, please contact an attorney in your area.
A defendant in a defamation case may raise a variety of defenses for libel or slander. True statements, reasonable opinions, and other circumstances don’t violate defamation laws.
Defamation occurs when someone publishes false information that harms another person’s reputation.
See common defenses to libel and slander torts (civil wrongs) in this article. To understand how to defend against defamation claims, it may help first to familiarize yourself with the elements of libel and slander.
Whether you are suing for defamation or defending against a lawsuit, a defamation lawyer can give you more personalized support.
Truth as a Defense to Libel and Slander
The common law (law developed over history by courts) traditionally presumed that a statement was false once a plaintiff proved that the statement was defamatory. Under modern defamation law, a plaintiff who is a public official or public figure must prove falsity as a prerequisite for recovery. Some states likewise now require falsity as an element of defamation that any plaintiff — even a private individual — must prove in order to recover. Where this is not a requirement, truth serves as an affirmative defense to a defamation claim (cause of action).
The applicability of the truth defense is strong against all types of defamation lawsuits, including defamation per se actions, where a plaintiff does not need to prove actual damages. A defamatory statement does not need to be literally true for this defense to be effective. Courts require that the statement is substantially true for the defense to apply. This means that even if the defendant states some false facts, if the”gist”or”sting”of the communication is substantially true, then the defendant can rely on the defense.
Consent as a Defense to Libel and Slander
When a plaintiff consents to the publication of a defamatory matter about them, this consent is an absolute defense to a defamation action.
Let’s say a plaintiff claims personal injuries for online defamation of character as a result of a defendant’s false statement of fact about them. The defamation suit may have strong injury case evidence for harm to reputation. The defendant admits to making defamatory statements about the plaintiff on social media. But the defendant also presents evidence that the plaintiff provided permission for the postings.
Here, it doesn’t even matter that the plaintiff suffered monetary damages as a result of harm to their reputation. The plaintiff gave consent to the defendant to post the false statements of fact on social media. Since the plaintiff gave permission, the defendant will have a successful consent defense.
Opinion as a Defense to Libel and Slander
The area of law concerning free speech affords strong protections to opinions. The Supreme Court has made rulings to protect the First Amendment freedom of speech, including personal opinions. A defendant can win if a reasonable person would believe that their defamatory statements were statements of opinion.
In making an opinion, a defendant should not act with either of the following:
- Reckless disregard for the truth
- Actual malice against the plaintiff’s reputation
Take these two examples:
- “In my opinion, Alex does not always tell the truth. But I may very well be mistaken, so don’t take my word for it.”
- “I don’t need to do any investigation to know Alex is a liar. I hate Alex. I have great intuition, and I am as sure of it as the sky is blue.”
In the first example, it may be clearer to a reasonable person that the defendant is providing an opinion. But the second example could amount to reckless disregard for the truth. In the second example, the defendant even admits their hate and refusal to do a proper investigation.
Absolute Privileges as a Defamation Defense
Some defendants are protected from liability in a defamation action based on the defendant’s position or status. These privileges are called”absolute privileges”and may also be considered immunities. In other words, the defense is not conditioned on the nature of the statement or upon the actor’s intent in making a false statement.
Absolute privileges apply to the following proceedings and circumstances:
- Judicial proceedings
- Legislative proceedings
- Some executive statements and publications, such as those by government officials
- Publications between spouses, including in family law cases
- Publications required by law
Qualified Privileges as a Defamation Defense
Other privileges do not arise from the person making the communication, but rather from the occasion in which the statement was made. These privileges are known as conditional, or qualified, privileges.
A defendant must prove that they meet the conditions established for the privileged communication. Generally, for a privilege to apply, the defendant must believe that a statement is true and, depending on the jurisdiction, either have reasonable grounds for believing that the statement was true or not have acted recklessly in ascertaining the truth or falsity of the statement.
Conditional privileges apply to the following types of communications:
- A statement that is made for the protection of the publisher’s interest
- A statement that is made for the protection of the interests of a third person
- A statement that is made for the protection of common interest
- A statement that is made to ensure the well-being of a family member
- A statement that is made where the person making the communication believes that the public interest requires communication of the statement to a public officer or other official
- A statement that is made by an inferior state officer who is not entitled to an absolute privilege
In some of these examples, the person made the statement out of necessity to protect someone. A qualified privilege argument can be similar to a necessity defense in that way.
Learn More About Defenses to Defamation
If you’ve been sued for slander or libel, or have questions about possible defenses to such charges, an experienced personal injury lawyer may be able to assist with legal advice. Their knowledge of the law can help you cut through the”my word versus theirs”debate of a libel or slander case.
Similarly, if you need to sue for defamation, a personal injury attorney with experience in this field can protect your rights. Keep in mind that each state has a time limit to file cases, known as the statute of limitations. Your case must be filed before the expiration.
Contact a local defamation attorney today for more information.
Can I Solve This on My Own or Do I Need an Attorney?
- A plaintiff’s lawyer can help seek fair compensation on your behalf
- A defendant’s lawyer can challenge the claim to protect your free speech rights
- Defamation claims are complex, but a lawyer can help create a robust strategy
Get tailored legal advice and ask a lawyer questions about your claim or defense case. Many attorneys offer free consultations.
Stay Up-to-Date With How the Law Affects Your Life
Enter your email address to subscribe

Enter your email address to subscribe
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.
Next Steps
Contact a qualified personal injury attorney to make sure your rights are protected.
Enter information. (Required)